From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5909DE06B for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:10:04 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com In-Reply-To: <20090130030758.GA7004@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20090129213429.GA29014@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <1233281510.18767.17.camel@pasglop> <20090130030758.GA7004@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:09:55 +1100 Message-Id: <1233288595.18767.20.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Actually, it doesn't matter whether a controller is a root IC or > cascaded. Just as primary handlers, chained handlers don't run in > threads, thus spinlocks should be used, not sleeping locks. Sounds good then. Cheers, Ben.