From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/cell: Only build Axon MSI driver for IBM Cell Blades From: Michael Ellerman To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20090305071356.GA9412@lixom.net> References: <20090305071356.GA9412@lixom.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K/SEB0cSmGAKwEQJJJjy" Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:07:05 +1100 Message-Id: <1236262025.8325.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-K/SEB0cSmGAKwEQJJJjy Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 01:13 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:41:41PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > The hardware is only present on those machines, and the driver > > depends on infrastructure which is selected by the Kconfig for > > cell blades. >=20 > Wouldn't it make more sense to make a separate (AXON_MSI) config option > depend on PPC_IBM_CELL_BLADE? Maybe, it would make the makefile cleaner, at the expense of a bit more Kconfig. I'm not sure what people prefer, I guess I'm neutral and you're voting for the latter, so I'll respin it that way :) cheers --=20 Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person --=-K/SEB0cSmGAKwEQJJJjy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkmv3IkACgkQdSjSd0sB4dKWggCguzOXhXwI5F/awr6XvMNEv/xD mRoAnAzTFFCFpY3C3P6oR6Eq3znMqV58 =swXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-K/SEB0cSmGAKwEQJJJjy--