linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving toward smarter disabling of FPRs, VRs, and VSRs in the MSR
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:45:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236984351.25062.71.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6F79BA93-346D-479F-BD63-D1D89B289D6F@kernel.crashing.org>


> If these applications are aware they are heavy users (of FP, VMX, VSX)  
> can we not use a sysctl()?  Doing so wouldn't be that difficult.
> 
> I think trying to do something based on a runtime heuristic sounds a  
> bit iffy.

Another option might be simply to say that if an app has used FP, VMX or
VSX -once-, then it's likely to do it again and just keep re-enabling
it :-)

I'm serious here, do we know that many cases where these things are used
seldomly once in a while ?

An if we do, maybe then a simple counter in the task struct... if the
app re-enables it more than a few consecutive switches, then make it
stick. I have the feeling that would work out reasonably well.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-13 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-13 20:23 [RFC] Moving toward smarter disabling of FPRs, VRs, and VSRs in the MSR Ryan Arnold
2009-03-13 21:15 ` Kumar Gala
2009-03-13 22:45   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-03-13 23:52     ` Josh Boyer
2009-03-14  2:31     ` Ryan Arnold
2009-03-14  3:22       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-14 13:55       ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-03-14 13:49     ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-03-14 14:58       ` Ryan Arnold
2009-03-16  0:49         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-16  6:43           ` Michael Neuling
2009-03-16 10:52       ` Gabriel Paubert
2009-03-14  8:20 ` Michael Neuling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236984351.25062.71.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sjmunroe@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).