From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A8DDDF6B for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:05:04 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Check name property to determine partition nodes. From: David Woodhouse To: Benjamin Krill In-Reply-To: <20090324132733.GN11318@codiert.org> References: <20090123161805.GA2598@codiert.org> <1233720542.16867.187.camel@pasglop> <20090218074738.GC12204@codiert.org> <20090324132733.GN11318@codiert.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:04:54 +0000 Message-Id: <1237903494.9441.1364.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: dwg@au1.ibm.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:27 +0100, Benjamin Krill wrote: > >>On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:18 +0100, Benjamin Krill wrote: > >>> SLOF has a further node which could not be evaluate > >>> by the current routine. The current routine returns > >>> because the node hasn't the required reg property. As > >>> fix this patch adds a check to determine the partition > >>> child nodes. If the node is not an partition the number > >>> of total partitions will be decreased and loop continue > >>> with the next nodes. > >> > >>Somebody on the MTD list is taking that ? David ? Or should I merge it > >>via powerpc ? > > > >Could somebody merge it for the next release? > > Again, new try to get it somewhere merged. Applied; thanks. -- dwmw2