From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Tony Breeds <tony@bakeyournoodle.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Quieten arch/powerpc in a allmodconfig build.
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:08:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239167335.10104.26.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c4bcf8d1d7083ff53ce5b556765e96676a007fb.1239165378.git.tony@bakeyournoodle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8454 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:36 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> This patch silences all the warnings generated in arch/powerpc for
> allmodconfig build.
>
> It does:
> * Where appropriate use the uninitialized_var() macro to help GCC
> understand we know what's going on.
> * Explicitly casts PHYSICAL_START in one printk()
> * Initialise a few variables, as it's "neater" than using uninitialized_var()
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony@bakeyournoodle.com>
> ---
> Only compile tested.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/axon_msi.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_iommu.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c | 5 ++---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> index bb37b1d..fd6aef9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static struct cache *index_kobj_to_cache(struct kobject *k)
>
> static ssize_t size_show(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - unsigned int size_kb;
> + unsigned int uninitialized_var(size_kb);
> struct cache *cache;
>
> cache = index_kobj_to_cache(k);
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static struct kobj_attribute cache_nr_sets_attr =
>
> static ssize_t associativity_show(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - unsigned int associativity;
> + unsigned int uninitialized_var(associativity);
> struct cache *cache;
The getter routines in here could really multiplex their return values
with a negative error code, which I generally prefer, but this works I
guess.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> index 1c67de5..b9d66ed 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void *traverse_pci_devices(struct device_node *start, traverse_func pre,
> void *data)
> {
> struct device_node *dn, *nextdn;
> - void *ret;
> + void *uninitialized_var(ret);
The code causing this one is a little ugly anyway, I think we should
change it to be:
- if (pre && ((ret = pre(dn, data)) != NULL))
- return ret;
+ if (pre) {
+ ret = pre(dn, data);
+ if (ret != NULL)
+ return ret;
+ }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/axon_msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/axon_msi.c
> index 0ce45c2..dae4c7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/axon_msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/axon_msi.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct axon_msic *find_msi_translator(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct irq_host *irq_host;
> struct device_node *dn, *tmp;
> - const phandle *ph;
> + const phandle *uninitialized_var(ph);
> struct axon_msic *msic = NULL;
Freakin gcc. This is just:
if (!dn)
return;
for (; dn; ..)
ph = ..
if (!ph)
And it can't work out that it's never used uninitialised?
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_iommu.c
> index 93b0efd..8230cd8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_iommu.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static unsigned long celleb_dma_direct_offset;
> static void __init celleb_init_direct_mapping(void)
> {
> u64 lpar_addr, io_addr;
> - u64 io_space_id, ioid, dma_base, dma_size, io_page_size;
> + u64 io_space_id=0, ioid=0, dma_base=0, dma_size=0, io_page_size=0;
Do you need a new spacebar? :D
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c
> index 02a634f..05f047d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c
> @@ -616,8 +616,8 @@ static inline struct device_node *xlate_iomm_address(
> */
> static u8 iseries_readb(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> struct HvCallPci_LoadReturn ret;
> struct device_node *dn =
> @@ -634,8 +634,8 @@ static u8 iseries_readb(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
>
> static u16 iseries_readw_be(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> struct HvCallPci_LoadReturn ret;
> struct device_node *dn =
> @@ -653,8 +653,8 @@ static u16 iseries_readw_be(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
>
> static u32 iseries_readl_be(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> struct HvCallPci_LoadReturn ret;
> struct device_node *dn =
> @@ -676,8 +676,8 @@ static u32 iseries_readl_be(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> */
> static void iseries_writeb(u8 data, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> u64 rc;
> struct device_node *dn =
> @@ -692,8 +692,8 @@ static void iseries_writeb(u8 data, volatile void __iomem *addr)
>
> static void iseries_writew_be(u16 data, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> u64 rc;
> struct device_node *dn =
> @@ -708,8 +708,8 @@ static void iseries_writew_be(u16 data, volatile void __iomem *addr)
>
> static void iseries_writel_be(u32 data, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> - u64 bar_offset;
> - u64 dsa;
> + u64 uninitialized_var(bar_offset);
> + u64 uninitialized_var(dsa);
> int retry = 0;
> u64 rc;
> struct device_node *dn =
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c
> index 21226b7..5989427 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/low_i2c.c
> @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pmac_low_i2c_unlock);
>
> int pmac_i2c_open(struct pmac_i2c_bus *bus, int polled)
> {
> - int rc;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&bus->mutex);
> bus->polled = polled || pmac_i2c_force_poll;
> @@ -1099,9 +1099,8 @@ int pmac_i2c_open(struct pmac_i2c_bus *bus, int polled)
> if (bus->open && (rc = bus->open(bus)) != 0) {
> bus->opened = 0;
> mutex_unlock(&bus->mutex);
> - return rc;
> }
> - return 0;
> + return rc;
This one is a bug surely?
1092 {
1093 int rc;
1094
1095 mutex_lock(&bus->mutex);
1096 bus->polled = polled || pmac_i2c_force_poll;
1097 bus->opened = 1;
1098 bus->mode = pmac_i2c_mode_std;
1099 if (bus->open && (rc = bus->open(bus)) != 0) {
1100 bus->opened = 0;
1101 mutex_unlock(&bus->mutex);
1102 return rc;
1103 }
1104 return 0;
1105 }
I can't reproduce it though with a simple test case :?
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> index bf2e1ac..d92f593 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int msi_quota_for_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int request)
> {
> struct device_node *pe_dn;
> struct msi_counts counts;
> - int total;
> + int uninitialized_var(total);
>
> pr_debug("rtas_msi: calc quota for %s, request %d\n", pci_name(dev),
> request);
Gah, gcc sucks. It should just not warn in these cases where it doesn't
know wth is going on.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 4:36 [PATCH] Quieten arch/powerpc in a allmodconfig build Tony Breeds
2009-04-08 5:08 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2009-04-08 5:51 ` Tony Breeds
2009-04-08 6:13 ` Tony Breeds
2009-04-08 6:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-04-08 6:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-04-08 7:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-08 18:47 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-04-09 0:01 ` Tony Breeds
2009-04-10 4:21 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-04-10 17:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-04-09 22:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-04-09 22:45 ` Tony Breeds
2009-04-09 23:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-09 23:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-04-10 18:03 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-10 18:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-04-10 18:43 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-10 20:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-04-10 20:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-04-10 21:51 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-09 23:18 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239167335.10104.26.camel@localhost \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tony@bakeyournoodle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).