linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: tracking of PCI address space
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:21:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239258091.7279.22.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E942C580-7C39-44AB-B207-C65CDE0B5292@kernel.crashing.org>

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:53 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if we have anything that tracks regions associated  
> with the "inbound" side of a pci_bus.
> 
> What I mean is on embedded PPC we have window/mapping registers for  
> both inbound (accessing memory on the SoC) and outbound (access PCI  
> device MMIO, IO etc).  The combination of the inbound & outbound  
> convey what exists in the PCI address space vs CPU physical address  
> space (and how to map from one to the other).  Today in the PPC land  
> we only attach outbound windows to the pci_bus.  So technically the  
> inbound side information (like what subset of physical memory is  
> visible on the PCI bus) seems to be lost.

On powerpc, we do keep track of the offset, but that's about it.

Tracking inbound ranges is very platform specific though. You can have
multiple inbound windows with different translations, in some cases some
via iommu and some not, or windows aliasing the same target memory but
with different attributes, etc...

I don't think there's that much interest in trying to create generic
code to keep track.

Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 20:53 tracking of PCI address space Kumar Gala
2009-04-08 21:49 ` Ira Snyder
2009-04-08 21:53   ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-09  6:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-04-09  6:44   ` Tirumala Reddy Marri
2009-04-09  6:55 ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1239258091.7279.22.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).