From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4718DDE22 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:17:50 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: PCI changes 2.6.26 => 2.6.28 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Gary Thomas In-Reply-To: <49F0EB6A.40000@mlbassoc.com> References: <49EDF333.4000200@mlbassoc.com> <49EE2CD8.7010700@mlbassoc.com> <29EEEBDE-B87C-4073-9967-E1DA7EFB0B0B@kernel.crashing.org> <49EE306D.3000401@mlbassoc.com> <49EE4729.3000100@mlbassoc.com> <612CEF05-3EFB-4947-B5FC-B35C1F9568D7@kernel.crashing.org> <46B035C0-624F-41E4-BFDD-C16479CF8FC8@kernel.crashing.org> <49EE5021.4020703@mlbassoc.com> <306F293D-44CD-4238-ADA9-BB7436C7004C@kernel.crashing.org> <49EE5A80.4030209@mlbassoc.com> <49F07A15.9010006@mlbassoc.com> <97DF2A19-563D-404A-AD3D-039D5989E489@kernel.crashing.org> <49F0EB6A.40000@mlbassoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:17:32 +1000 Message-Id: <1240838253.7169.12.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 16:27 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > I don't think any of this matters. It turns out that even > the 2.6.26 kernel fails on an identical board with a newer > revision of the 8347 chip. I'm sure that the problem is > that the Coral-P fails when mapped to 0 (PCI relative). There are macro that the PCI code uses to define the min address to assign to devices but it's broken for us as it doesn't account for the kind of remapping we do... I've been wanting to fix those for some time but didn't get a chance yet, that would sort this out. Ben.