From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B7BDDE9E for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:53:17 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Please revert edada399 and 9203fc9c From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Sam Ravnborg In-Reply-To: <20090428083528.GA17622@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <18934.35969.872225.70725@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20090428083528.GA17622@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:52:27 +1000 Message-Id: <1240951947.15263.5.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linus Torvalds , Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Abbott List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:35 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > This is partly my fault :-( > I acked them as I did not see the issue with conditional branches. > Could I ask you to add a comment to the lds file about this. I'm back :-) Not a huge deal per-se, it's just that the patches were merged in Linus tree only a few hours after being initially submitted it seems, which doesn't leave much chance for anybody to test, to hit -next, or anything like that... that was a little bit too trigger happy . Cheers, Ben.