From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.10.76.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bilbo.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5440DDE050 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:24:34 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Make the NR_CPUS max 8192 From: Michael Ellerman To: Michael Neuling In-Reply-To: <17087.1242609196@neuling.org> References: <17087.1242609196@neuling.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JxJIjAKiK46r42zU707W" Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:24:33 +1000 Message-Id: <1242609873.13757.4.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-JxJIjAKiK46r42zU707W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:13 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > We can compile and boot with NR_CPUS=3D8192, so make this the max. 1024 > was an arbitrary decision anyway. Is 8192 still arbitrary? Or does something break above that? cheers --=-JxJIjAKiK46r42zU707W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkoQuM0ACgkQdSjSd0sB4dKgSwCfbKo7HVrt5T11sVfjLi8RHgPH AnsAn2lCB6JciYeIzgmDUJNU1bes8zsd =khXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JxJIjAKiK46r42zU707W--