From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.netcologne.de (smtp3.netcologne.de [194.8.194.66]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC00FDDE01 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:35:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:35:26 +0200 From: Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?b?RHJl3w==?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: tiny memcpy_(to|from)io optimisation To: Kenneth Johansson References: <1243968361.4951.0@antares> <1243983086.27194.7.camel@pasglop> <1244039796.20864.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1244039796.20864.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (from kenneth@southpole.se on Wed Jun 3 16:36:36 2009) Message-Id: <1244054133.3367.0@antares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jQo4Z5PnWfYq5B0ywsKn" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-jQo4Z5PnWfYq5B0ywsKn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03.06.09 16:36 schrieb(en) Kenneth Johansson: > On an e300 core using the lwzu/stwu is about 20% faster so at least =20 > one core prefer that optimization. Bingo. The '5200 on my test system has that core. So "-mcpu=3D603e" =20 should select this strategy! Cheers, Albrecht. --=-jQo4Z5PnWfYq5B0ywsKn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBKJsJ1n/9unNAn/9ERAl+WAJ9N5bJav9AmNwSQ79O1g+WHCmKyXwCgyshy OOZ5um6MIcquF8sz30L3bAs= =TjH/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jQo4Z5PnWfYq5B0ywsKn--