From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F25B71BE for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:17:12 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77C7DDD0B for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:17:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: linux-next: powerpc tree build warning From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <20090611113930.78a42893.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090611113930.78a42893.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:14:04 +1000 Message-Id: <1244690044.5739.31.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:39 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:60:warning: defaults for choice values not supported > > We appear to have CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S int two places which is confusing > Kconfig. Yes, I see that. One place depends on PPC32 and the other one PPC64, but it still seems to be somewhat confused. In any case, it seems to still do the right thing, so not a big hurry here, but I'll do a patch that does it differently. Cheers, Ben.