From: Nate Case <ncase@xes-inc.com>
To: Subodh Nijsure <sunijsur@cisco.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: System clock systems to be twice as fast as RTC
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:07:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244736474.29684.1643.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008701c9eaa7$3c8336c0$8dde520a@cisco.com>
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 08:13 -0700, Subodh Nijsure wrote:
> The system clock seems to be running twice as as fast as RTC,
>
> sh-2.05b# date ; sleep 60 ; date
> Fri Sep 11 01:37:11 UTC 1970
> Fri Sep 11 01:37:41 UTC 1970
That's strange, but note that "date" reads the system clock and not the
RTC. Use "hwclock" for the RTC.
--
Nate Case <ncase@xes-inc.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 15:13 System clock systems to be twice as fast as RTC Subodh Nijsure
2009-06-11 16:07 ` Nate Case [this message]
2009-06-11 21:41 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244736474.29684.1643.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ncase@xes-inc.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sunijsur@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).