From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF42AB7263 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:59:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A820DDD1C for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:59:28 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] of_serial: Add UPF_FIXED_TYPE flag From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1245399861.10629.194.camel@concordia> References: <1244590787-13716-1-git-send-email-dmitchell@amcc.com> <1245399861.10629.194.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:59:10 +1000 Message-Id: <1245452350.16880.13.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Dave Mitchell , arnd@arndb.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 18:24 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > I think we /probably/ want a similar change in legacy_serial.c, for > soc > ports at least. > > Or do people have things that are compatible "ns16550" but aren't? > Do we really want to keep of_serial.c ? I fail to see the point in keeping -both- the of_serial (of_device variant) and the legacy serial stuff which shims the device-tree into platform devices. They tend to clash with each other too, which is annoying. Cheers, Ben