From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632BBB7085 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:58:59 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code From: Subrata Modak To: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <1247216007.29541.2.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <20090701135247.27488.10776.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1246846628.5743.2.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247205588.20721.353.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247206539.6630.0.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4A56DD51.5040703@gmail.com> <1247209961.6630.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247210095.20721.362.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247215625.6630.6.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247216007.29541.2.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:28:44 +0530 Message-Id: <1247216324.6630.10.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: carolyn.j.smith@exgate.tek.com, Stephen Rothwell , Artem Bityutskiy , dedekind@infradead.org, linux-kernel , Jim Cromie , Sachin P Sant , linux-next , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Linuxppc-dev , Scott Wood , Balbir Singh Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is > > released ? > Hi David, > Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for > 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32. > > Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it? > It's been like this for _ages_. True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And we(Sachin & myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else, 2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support. Regards-- Subrata >