From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linasvepstas@gmail.com,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hold reference to device_node during EEH event handling
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:41:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247708506.9851.8.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A5E4D68.6070909@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1456 bytes --]
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 14:43 -0700, Mike Mason wrote:
> This patch increments the device_node reference counter when an EEH
> error occurs and decrements the counter when the event has been
> handled. This is to prevent the device_node from being released until
> eeh_event_handler() has had a chance to deal with the event. We've
> seen cases where the device_node is released too soon when an EEH
> event occurs during a dlpar remove, causing the event handler to
> attempt to access bad memory locations.
>
> Please review and let me know of any concerns.
Taking a reference sounds sane, but ...
> Signed-off-by: Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com>
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c 2008-10-09 15:13:53.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_event.c 2009-07-14 14:14:00.000000000 -0700
> @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ static int eeh_event_handler(void * dumm
> if (event == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> + /* EEH holds a reference to the device_node, so if it
> + * equals 1 it's no longer valid and the event should
> + * be ignored */
> + if (atomic_read(&event->dn->kref.refcount) == 1) {
> + of_node_put(event->dn);
> + return 0;
> + }
That's really gross :)
And what happens if the refcount goes to 1 just after the check? ie.
here.
> /* Serialize processing of EEH events */
> mutex_lock(&eeh_event_mutex);
> eeh_mark_slot(event->dn, EEH_MODE_RECOVERING);
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-15 21:43 [PATCH] Hold reference to device_node during EEH event handling Mike Mason
2009-07-16 1:41 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2009-07-16 16:33 ` Mike Mason
2009-07-17 0:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-07-22 23:41 ` Mike Mason
2009-07-23 1:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-07-23 14:16 ` Linas Vepstas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247708506.9851.8.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mmlnx@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).