From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82954B7089 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:54:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB01DDD0B for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:54:08 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:53:35 +1000 Message-Id: <1248310415.3367.22.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux-Arch , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 09:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > Maybe you can put it as a separate branch in -next, and have it merged > before the stuff that depends on it, and then just sending it to me (as a > git branch or patch or whatever) in the first day of the merge window? Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my sub-maintainers to also pull from that other branch first :-) Cheers, Ben.