From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A054B7BA3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:42 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A683FDDD0B for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:41 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Generic NVRAM support for large MMIO devices From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Martyn Welch In-Reply-To: <4A697E22.2080609@gefanuc.com> References: <20090702154928.31202.65107.stgit@ES-J7S4D2J.amer.consind.ge.com> <1248335077.3367.79.camel@pasglop> <4A697E22.2080609@gefanuc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:35:26 +1000 Message-Id: <1248431726.25467.29.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I'm not aware of a maintainer for the "generic nvram" driver. As > mentioned in my other email, I'm fairly confident that this driver > (/drivers/char/generic_nvram.c) is only used on PowerPC. I'm beginning > to enter what is for me uncharted territory :-) How should I proceed? > Are you happy to take the entire patch series, do I send the entire > patch series to Andrew and LKML or just patch 2/5? I'll dbl check, if it's only ppc then I'll take the whole series, As usual, if you don't see things happening by end of next week, ping me :-) But it's on patchwork so hopefully it won't fall through the cracks. Cheers, Ben.