From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E98AB7067 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:47:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E2EDDD01 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:47:32 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] agp/uninorth: Unify U3 and pre-U3 insert_memory and remove_memory hooks. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= In-Reply-To: <1250151313.4992.202.camel@thor> References: <1249422665-24437-1-git-send-email-michel@daenzer.net> <1249422665-24437-3-git-send-email-michel@daenzer.net> <1250147148.3587.115.camel@pasglop> <1250151313.4992.202.camel@thor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:47:12 +1000 Message-Id: <1250729232.4810.43.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Dave Airlie , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:15 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:51 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > From: Michel Dänzer > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer > > > --- > > > > Hi Michel ! > > > > While your two previous patches apply just fine, this one doesn't, > > the uninorth_insert_memory() function seems to be slightly different > > upstream. Does this depend on some separate yet unapplied patches ? > > I previously sent the attached patches to Dave in the course of the > radeon KMS issues thread. Not sure which of these he's picked up yet, if > any. I merged the first two patches in your series, we can sort out the 3rd one in a second pass on the merge window. Cheers, Ben. > > > I'm putting 1/3 and 2/3 into my -test branch and they should hit my > > -next branch in a couple of days. > > > > Or do you prefer us to merge that via Dave ? > > > > The thing is, stuff in -powerpc is much more likely to get some amount > > of testing on actual ppc hardware than stuff in random other trees :-) > > I'm fine with either way. > >