From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DDAB7067
	for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:06 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] powerpc: use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <1251342735.20467.2.camel@pasglop>
References: <1249448908-18985-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<1250142522.3587.110.camel@pasglop>
	<20090813160625B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<20090813074131.GH12143@elte.hu> <1250150981.3587.157.camel@pasglop>
	<20090813085505.GA10671@elte.hu>  <1251342735.20467.2.camel@pasglop>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:17:50 +1000
Message-Id: <1251343070.20467.3.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	galak@kernel.crashing.orga
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:12 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate 
> > branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing?
> 
> Allright so after various delays and sidetracking on my side, the
> patches have been in my -test branch for long enough, I'm happy for them
> to go in either way now.
> 
> I'm going to take them out of powerpc test for now and not put them in
> my -next right away until I'm sure I have the right source to pull, at
> which point I can just put from tip iommu.

IE. I think I was not clear :-)

I mean, I plan to pull tip/iommu into powerpc-next and then apply the
patches, but I want just your final word that this is a
"stable" (non-rebase) branch and from Fujita that the patches are still
good and haven't changed from those currently on patchwork.

Cheers,
Ben.