From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1CDB7BE5 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:21:44 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B627DDD04 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:21:42 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: lmb: Remove __init from lmb_end_of_DRAM() From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <200908271959.n7RJxNvV008624@hera.kernel.org> References: <200908271959.n7RJxNvV008624@hera.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:21:28 +1000 Message-Id: <1251444088.20467.169.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Linux Kernel list , "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 19:59 +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/4f8ee2c9cc0e885d2bb50ef26db66150ab25213e > Commit: 4f8ee2c9cc0e885d2bb50ef26db66150ab25213e > Parent: cf481442f2e086316ed8a1b3046f00ad23632ac4 > Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > AuthorDate: Thu Aug 27 17:20:30 2009 +1000 > Committer: Linus Torvalds > CommitDate: Thu Aug 27 12:25:26 2009 -0700 > > lmb: Remove __init from lmb_end_of_DRAM() > > We call lmb_end_of_DRAM() to test whether a DMA mask is ok on a machine > without IOMMU, but this function is marked as __init. > > I don't think there's a clean way to get the top of RAM max_pfn doesn't > appear to include highmem or I missed (or we have a bug :-) so for now, > let's just avoid having a broken 2.6.31 by making this function > non-__init and we can revisit later. And another brown paper bag for me ! Patch is fine, but doesn't do the job because some idiot (me) didn't actually test (it looked so obvious) and didn't notice somebody had the strange idea to also put __init on the declaration in the .h file ! Ugh. I'll send another patch later, have to run home now. Cheers, Ben.