From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC] powerpc/irq: Add generic API for setting up cascaded IRQs From: Michael Ellerman To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1253008958.8375.213.camel@pasglop> References: <20090912054410.21847.63718.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1252736925.8375.65.camel@pasglop> <1253008958.8375.213.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-C1or3xhht7cMvHphg6Zi" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:04:16 +1000 Message-Id: <1253012656.5795.39.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-C1or3xhht7cMvHphg6Zi Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 20:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > I'm a reverse polish kind of guy. I preferring 'subject'_'action' > > over 'action'_'subject' just because it groups like subjects together. > > But it doesn't matter much, especially in this case where 'subject' > > is in a group of exactly 1. :-) > >=20 > > I'll do whichever you prefer. >=20 > I just caught myself calling something relocs_check instead of > check_relocs so I suppose it's fair game :-) Yeah but that sounds stupid :) > Whatever you want. I want a pony. And setup_cascade() is definitely better IMHO. cheers --=-C1or3xhht7cMvHphg6Zi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqvdKgACgkQdSjSd0sB4dIpQACeMNYUWgRJV8V2BHcpnLyT2Std QdgAoMEcNxeEWUEceRlGroDHerEFCTCU =GtMd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-C1or3xhht7cMvHphg6Zi--