From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6423FB7BCB for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:31:03 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: 64bit kernel is huge From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Michael Neuling In-Reply-To: <5642.1254290487@neuling.org> References: <20090928074503.GB16073@kryten> <5642.1254290487@neuling.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:30:55 +1000 Message-Id: <1254342655.5699.9.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:01 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote: > 2.6.30 9221595 1620728 1052812 11895135 b5815f > 2.6.29 9104807 1569840 785292 11459939 aedd63 The jump in BSS size is huge... lockdep ? Ben.