From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5A19B7334 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:29:33 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: New percpu & ppc64 perfs From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Tejun Heo In-Reply-To: <4AD52E37.80209@kernel.org> References: <1255478358.2347.28.camel@pasglop> <4AD52E37.80209@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:28:31 +1100 Message-Id: <1255490911.2347.32.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:49 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > For 256M segment, I don't think much can be done but for 1T segment, > just limiting vmalloc area size to 1T should do the trick, no? Right. I'll have a look at it. Cheers, Ben.