From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e37.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A6CB7334 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:57:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9EMuAIr009123 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:56:10 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9EMvAGw141386 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:57:10 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9EMwaDJ027221 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:58:36 -0600 Subject: Re: linux-next: tree build failure From: Hollis Blanchard To: Jan Beulich In-Reply-To: <1255115648.2546.71.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <4AC1E15502000078000516B5@vpn.id2.novell.com> <1254267572.15622.1621.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> <4AC318450200007800017355@vpn.id2.novell.com> <1254498517.3839.17.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> <4AC9B5310200007800017EA1@vpn.id2.novell.com> <1255115648.2546.71.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:57:06 -0700 Message-Id: <1255561026.29192.0.camel@slab.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:14 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Rusty's version of BUILD_BUG_ON() does indeed fix the build break, and > also exposes the bug in kvmppc_account_exit_stat(). So to recap: > > original: built but didn't work > Jan's: doesn't build > Rusty's: builds and works > > Where do you want to go from here? Jan, what are your thoughts? Your BUILD_BUG_ON patch has broken the build, and we still need to fix it. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center