LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: Enable sparse irq_descs on powerpc
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:51:16 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255564276.9651.14.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40910141144y1776c476uc8e26e06eb57e6ac@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1262 bytes --]

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:44 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Michael Ellerman
> <michael@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > Defining CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ enables generic code that gets rid of the
> > static irq_desc array, and replaces it with an array of pointers to
> > irq_descs.
> >
> > It also allows node local allocation of irq_descs, however we
> > currently don't have the information available to do that, so we just
> > allocate them on all on node 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> 
> Why not make sparse IRQs manditory for all platforms?  Is there a
> performance concern with doing so?  From a maintenance perspective,
> I'd rather see IRQ descs manged in one way only to keep the code
> simple.

I agree on the maintenance angle. My thinking was we'd run with it
optional but default y for a release or two, and if no one complains we
can make it mandatory.

It does make some code paths bigger, and looking up an irq_desc is going
to take slightly more cycles. I don't think it's a big issue, but I
thought we should try it for a while before making it mandatory. The
code has only been tested on x86 and sh as far as I know.

cheers

ps. thanks for the review

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-14 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-14  5:44 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: Make NR_IRQS a CONFIG option Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14  5:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: Use irq_has_action() in eeh_disable_irq() Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14 18:33   ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14  5:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc: Remove get_irq_desc() Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14 19:02   ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14  5:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: Make virq_debug_show() cope with sparse irq_descs Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14 18:34   ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14  5:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: Rearrange and fix show_interrupts() for " Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14 18:37   ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14  5:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: Enable sparse irq_descs on powerpc Michael Ellerman
2009-10-14 18:44   ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14 23:51     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2009-10-15  0:33       ` Grant Likely
2009-10-14 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: Make NR_IRQS a CONFIG option Grant Likely
2009-10-14 23:47   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1255564276.9651.14.camel@concordia \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox