From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47811B7B7B for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:19:52 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: i2c-powermac fails From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jean Delvare In-Reply-To: <20091015124923.23863a94@hyperion.delvare> References: <20091013112304.74083fd1@hyperion.delvare> <1255426348.2192.187.camel@pasglop> <20091013114948.03608b7f@hyperion.delvare> <20091014230252.0d0cba8d@hyperion.delvare> <1255555575.2347.56.camel@pasglop> <20091015124923.23863a94@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:19:19 +1100 Message-Id: <1255605559.2347.102.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , Tim Shepard , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 12:49 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Oh. Well, if that was the case, we would see errors all the time, not > just during initialization, right? Or does the I2C clock frequency > change over time somehow? No but maybe we are a bit on the "limit" of the device and some registers take long to respond than others ? Cheers, Ben.