From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A8BB7BEF for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:28:10 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 v5] CPU DLPAR Handling From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Nathan Fontenot In-Reply-To: <4AE8B0B1.4020102@austin.ibm.com> References: <4AE8ADCF.6090104@austin.ibm.com> <4AE8B0B1.4020102@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:26:03 +1100 Message-ID: <1256786763.26770.46.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:59 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE > +static ssize_t cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count) dlpar_cpu_probe() pls > +static ssize_t cpu_release(const char *buf, size_t count) > +{ Ditto. Or else in system.map, backtraces, etc... it's hard to figure out off hand where it's dying :-) Cheers, Ben.