From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478C5B7BC7 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:47:35 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/27] Add book3s_64 specific opcode emulation From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200911040943.46617.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1256917647-6200-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <280C9FF6-1C52-4856-9F60-15DA0659FC31@suse.de> <1257284313.7907.80.camel@pasglop> <200911040943.46617.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:47:21 +1100 Message-ID: <1257324441.13611.55.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Kevin Wolf , Hollis Blanchard , Marcelo Tosatti , Alexander Graf , kvm-ppc , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, bphilips@suse.de, Olof Johansson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 09:43 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 03 November 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > (Though glibc can be nasty, afaik it might load up optimized > variants of > > some routines with hard wired cache line sizes based on the CPU > type) > > You can also get application with hand-coded cache optimizations > that are even harder, if not impossible, to fix. Right. But those are already broken across CPU variants anyways. Cheers, Ben