From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e5.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A02B6F15 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:18:19 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAUF7BQO016944 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:07:11 -0500 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAUFIFVn136482 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:18:15 -0500 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAUFHr6Y005993 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:17:53 -0700 Subject: Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup. From: Will Schmidt To: rostedt@goodmis.org In-Reply-To: <1259183974.21397.73.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1259165529.16349.191.camel@lexx> <1259183974.21397.73.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:17:52 -0600 Message-ID: <1259594272.16349.393.camel@lexx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , Frederic Weisbecker , mingo@redhat.com, Anton Blanchard Reply-To: will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:19 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:12 -0600, Will Schmidt wrote: > > > Tested-by: Will Schmidt > > Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt > > Isn't it assumed that the one that made the patch also tested it? Well I > would hope that is the norm. I like to make that assumption, but wanted to be clear on the point for anyone with doubts. :-) > > -- Steve > >