From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] powerpc: Reduce differences between pseries and ppc64 defconfigs From: Michael Ellerman To: Anton Blanchard In-Reply-To: <20091207034714.GC3421@kryten> References: <20091207034509.GA3421@kryten> <20091207034555.GB3421@kryten> <20091207034714.GC3421@kryten> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iwfOONgY8KbtCYDknTo7" Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:27:21 +1100 Message-ID: <1260235641.4668.1.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-iwfOONgY8KbtCYDknTo7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 14:47 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > The pseries and ppc64 defconfigs have drifted apart over the years. Reduc= e > some of the differences while still keeping the idea that the ppc64 defco= nfig > is cross platform but enables fewer features than pseries, eg: >=20 > - NR_CPUS is lower > - No NUMA support Hmm, most of the modern 64 bit platforms are NUMA aren't they? Just a thought. cheers --=-iwfOONgY8KbtCYDknTo7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAksdq3UACgkQdSjSd0sB4dLL/ACfdifOCb3woZDn6Aws4szk+nU6 FLIAoLV6ogDPKrTCCjzoIgGsgfqKH45v =vbZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iwfOONgY8KbtCYDknTo7--