From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89DD8B7B6C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:32:35 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] powerpc: Reduce differences between pseries and ppc64 defconfigs From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1260235641.4668.1.camel@concordia> References: <20091207034509.GA3421@kryten> <20091207034555.GB3421@kryten> <20091207034714.GC3421@kryten> <1260235641.4668.1.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:32:24 +1100 Message-ID: <1260235944.10809.23.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:27 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > The pseries and ppc64 defconfigs have drifted apart over the years. > Reduce > > some of the differences while still keeping the idea that the ppc64 > defconfig > > is cross platform but enables fewer features than pseries, eg: > > > > - NR_CPUS is lower > > - No NUMA support > > Hmm, most of the modern 64 bit platforms are NUMA aren't they? Just a > thought. Also no NUMA is going to hurt Cell too. I think we should leave that in. Cheers, Ben.