From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5B7B6EF4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:29:48 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: 2.6.33 -next tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20091209042514.GA7837@lixom.net> References: <1260311383.16132.4.camel@pasglop> <20091208144505.af1dd7a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20091209042514.GA7837@lixom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:29:32 +1100 Message-ID: <1260332972.16132.8.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , Andrew Morton , David Brownell , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:25 -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:45:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:29:43 +1100 > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:33 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > This tree has also been in linux-next for a while now, so it should be > > > > a safe pull. > > > > > > I'll pull it, I'll pull it, stop nagging :-) > > > > > > > ooh, does nagging work? > > > > > > Remains to be seen. He hasn't actually pulled it yet, has he? :) Well, actually I have ... but I haven't pushed the result out yet :-) Cheers, Ben.