From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Felix Radensky <felix@embedded-sol.com>
Cc: Stef van Os <stef.van.os@Prodrive.nl>, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
Feng Kan <fkan@amcc.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: PCI-PCI bridge scanning broken on 460EX
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:53:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263243199.724.146.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4B55CF.9000707@embedded-sol.com>
> It seems I was wrong. I've manually applied the patch at the wrong
> place. After patching the correct function
> I'm not getting hard resets any more, which is a great improvement !
> Thanks a lot, I really appreciate your help !
This is somewhat funny... I wonder how it would have managed to find
anything behind the root complex P2P bridge with broken type 1 cycles...
very very strange.
> Unfortunately not all problems are gone. PLX is now identified
> correctly, but device behind it is not detected,
> although u-boot detects it correctly. See below.
You have removed all your changes to that code right ?
Also the log still looks weird:
> pci 0000:01:02.0: scanning behind bridge, config 010100, pass 0
> pci 0000:01:02.0: bus configuration invalid, reconfiguring
> pci 0000:01:02.0: scanning behind bridge, config 010100, pass 1
> pci_bus 0000:01: bus scan returning with max=01
> pci 0000:00:02.0: scanning behind bridge, config 010100, pass 1
> pci_bus 0000:00: bus scan returning with max=01
Unless you left some experimental changes in, the above isn't right, the
"config" value should have changed due to the write of ~ffffff to it
If the code running is indeed unmodified from upsteam, can you try with
just that change:
/* Check if setup is sensible at all */
- if (!pass &&
- ((buses & 0xff) != bus->number || ((buses >> 8) & 0xff) <= bus->number)) {
+ if (((buses & 0xff) != bus->number || ((buses >> 8) & 0xff) <= bus->number)) {
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "bus configuration invalid, reconfiguring\n");
broken = 1;
}
(IE remove the check for !pass)
Cheers,
Ben.
> pci 0000:00:02.0: disabling bridge window [mem 0xd80000000-0xd8c0fffff]
> to [bus 01-01] (unused)
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-01]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [io disabled]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem disabled]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem pref disabled]
> pci_bus 0000:00: resource 0 [io 0x0000-0xffff]
> pci_bus 0000:00: resource 1 [mem 0xd80000000-0xdffffffff]
> pci_bus 0000:01: resource 1 [??? 57982058496-58184433663 flags 0x0]
>
> Any ideas what could be wrong now ?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Felix.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-28 10:51 PCI-PCI bridge scanning broken on 460EX Felix Radensky
2010-01-04 5:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-04 8:59 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-10 12:56 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-10 20:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-10 21:13 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-10 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-11 9:58 ` Stef van Os
2010-01-11 11:48 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-11 16:46 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-11 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-01-11 22:48 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-11 22:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-12 11:02 ` Felix Radensky
2010-01-12 11:14 ` Stef van Os
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1263243199.724.146.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=felix@embedded-sol.com \
--cc=fkan@amcc.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=stef.van.os@Prodrive.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).