From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEDEB7C98
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:58:21 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/4xx: Add support for type 1 pci transactions
	on 4xx boards
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Felix Radensky <felix@embedded-sol.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B5637A6.5070600@embedded-sol.com>
References: <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC89421303B8AD11@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>
	<1263338326.724.216.camel@pasglop> <1263444961.724.343.camel@pasglop>
	<4B5637A6.5070600@embedded-sol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:57:53 +1100
Message-ID: <1263941873.724.524.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Stef van Os <stef.van.os@Prodrive.nl>, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
	Feng Kan <fkan@amcc.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 00:52 +0200, Felix Radensky wrote:
> 
> 405XX - no
> 440EP - no
> 440GR - no
> 440EPx/440GRx - no
> 
> 440GP - yes
> 440GX - yes
> 440SP - yes
> 440SPe - yes
> 460XX - yes
> 
> The distinction between these groups is pretty clear in the device trees.
> The members of the first group all have "ibm,plb-pci" property, and all
> members of second group have "ibm,plb-pcix" property.
> 
> So only ppc4xx_probe_pcix_bridge() routine should be fixed.

Ah cool, I hadn't noticed that it matched the cell type.

Cheers,
Ben.