From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xes-mad.com (xes-mad.com [216.165.139.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09BB71007D2 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:20:46 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] edac: Remove unused mpc85xx debug code From: Peter Tyser To: bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <1258677749-15968-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com> References: <1258677749-15968-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:20:13 -0600 Message-ID: <1264440013.22019.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, djiang@mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 18:42 -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: > Some unused, unsupported debug code existed in the mpc85xx EDAC driver > that resulted in a build failure when CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG was defined: > > drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c: In function 'mpc85xx_mc_err_probe': > drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:1031: error: implicit declaration of function 'edac_mc_register_mcidev_debug' > drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:1031: error: 'debug_attr' undeclared (first use in this function) > drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:1031: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c:1031: error: for each function it appears in.) > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser Any chance some of these will be picked up for 2.6.33? I added Kumar on CC as I'm not sure if these should go through the EDAC or PPC tree. 1/4 fixes a build error when CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG is defined and is pretty trivial. 2/4 fixes a regression which results in ECC detection not working. 3/4 and 4/4 are "improvements", but don't necessarily need to go into 2.6.33. Best, Peter