From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] Update ibm,client-architecture call field based on device tree
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:27:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265254065.8287.147.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6870DF.9030408@austin.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 12:37 -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
> >> + if(*cores != NR_CPUS)
> >> + prom_printf("client-architecture structure corrupted\n");
> >> + *cores = (NR_CPUS / prom_smt_way());
> >> + prom_printf("setting client-architecture cores to %x\n", *cores);
> >>
> >
> > I don't know if I'm painting a bike shed of if this is a real concern, but if
> > *cores isn't NR_CPUS shouldn't we do nothing rather then clobbering it?
> >
> > Yours Tony
> >
> If it isn't NR_CPUS we're pretty broken if we set it or if we don't. My
> previous version did a BUILD_BUG_ON() but Ben didn't like that and said
> he preferred just a warning message.
BUILD_BUG_ON would probably not have worked unless gcc smarter than I
think it is :-) Your latest approach is bad because when you detect
you are poking at the wrong thing ... you still proceed and do it. In
fact you -are- poking at the wrong thing always since you are missing
PTRRELOC() to relocate the pointer to the vec.
I'll post a new variant of that patch.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 20:38 [PATCH 0/2] Add max CPU nodes field to ibm,client-architecture call Joel Schopp
2010-01-14 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add static fields " Joel Schopp
2010-01-14 23:01 ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-15 2:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-15 2:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-02-01 22:50 ` [PATCHv2 " Joel Schopp
2010-01-14 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Update ibm,client-architecture call field based on device tree Joel Schopp
2010-01-15 2:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-02-01 22:51 ` [PATCHv2 " Joel Schopp
2010-02-02 3:48 ` Tony Breeds
2010-02-02 18:37 ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-04 3:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-02-01 22:50 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Add max CPU nodes field to ibm,client-architecture call Joel Schopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1265254065.8287.147.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).