From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp6.netcologne.de (smtp6.netcologne.de [194.8.194.26]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FBDB7CCD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:15:32 +1100 (EST) Received: from antares (xdsl-89-0-133-48.netcologne.de [89.0.133.48]) by smtp6.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769902A0B61 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:15:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from antares (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antares (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C13ABA03E for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:15:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:15:21 +0100 From: Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?b?RHJl3w==?= Subject: mpc512x uart: testers wanted To: Linux PPC Development Message-Id: <1267978529.2306.0@antares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-qyyQ4bzHLTNOOn8Mpqeg" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-qyyQ4bzHLTNOOn8Mpqeg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I recently posted a patch which improves the baud rate calculation on the m= pc5200b. Following requests by Grant and Wolfram, I added changes which do= also affect the mpc512x. Unfortunately, I don't have access to such a system, but IMHO the code (bot= h the old implementation and my changes) contradict the data sheet. Thus, = it would be really helpful if you give give the code a try and report your = experiences: Thanks in advance, Albrecht. --=-qyyQ4bzHLTNOOn8Mpqeg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLk9Ehn/9unNAn/9ERAtc3AJ9lk7DSko33MryTSBMC/ZtgBxs+BwCggkTf 4LeXR/UXruB9GZ16wN56b3A= =4jap -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qyyQ4bzHLTNOOn8Mpqeg--