From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1106B7D6A for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:48:34 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: References: <20100314065526.GA5353@x200> <20100314112428.GA4142@x200> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:23:46 +1100 Message-ID: <1268623426.2209.109.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Christian Kujau , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexey Dobriyan , LKML List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 12:51 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Christian Kujau writes: > > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 at 13:24, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > >> Post "find /proc/device-tree" output. > > > > I did upload[0] a tarball of /proc/device-tree, please see below the > > "find" output. > > > > Indeed, there's a /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0/l2-cache and > > /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0/l2-cache#1 in the device-tree. However, from looking at > > the logfiles, the > > > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" > > That's a red herring, the real problem is this: > > name 'pulses/rev' > > Of course, this name cannot be found in /proc/device-tree, because it > wasn't created. You mean apple stuck a bloody "/" in a name property ? ARGH ! We should just add code to detect that and replace it with a "_" or something... Cheers, Ben.