linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com,
	microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:57:04 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318144836.21082.93040.stgit@angua>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 727 bytes --]

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc).  Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
> node pointer from struct device.

Assuming this is similar to your experimental-devicetree branch, as of
96b4b9d7 it causes a few build errors for me:

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/2688/

Broken are 86xx/sbc8641d_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig,
mpc885_ads_defconfig, mpc85xx_defconfig, and pmac32_defconfig.

I haven't dug any further.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-23  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18 15:22 [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 01/10] driver-core: Add device node pointer to " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:58   ` Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 16:24     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:59   ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:07     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:10       ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12   ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 07/10] of: eliminate calls to dev_archdata_set_node() Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:47   ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-18 16:22     ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-23  6:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2010-03-23  7:06   ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
    --cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).