linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "lguest@ozlabs.org" <lguest@ozlabs.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:16:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269458163.28761.859.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003241824500.3147@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 17:44 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: 
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:19 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Move arch_init_copy_chip_data and arch_free_chip_data into function
> > > > pointers in struct irq_chip since they operate on irq_desc->chip_data.
> > > 
> > > Not sure about that. These functions are solely used by x86 and there
> > > is really no need to generalize them.
> > 
> > I thought the idea of struct irq_chip was to allow the potential for
> > multiple IRQ controllers in a system? Given that it seems that struct
> > irq_desc->chip_data ought to be available for use by whichever struct
> > irq_chip is managing a given interrupt. At the moment this is not
> > possible because we step around the abstraction using these arch_*
> > methods.
> 
> Right, but you have exactly _ONE_ irq_chip associated to an irq_desc,
> but that same irq_chip can be associated to several irq_descs. So
> irq_desc->data is there to provide data for the irq_chip functions
> depending on what irq they handle (e.g. base_address ...). 
> 
> irq_desc->chip_data is set when the irq_chip is assigned to the
> irq_desc.
> 
> So there is no point in having functions in irq_chip to set
> irq_desc->chip_data.

So how do you know which is the appropriate irq_chip specific function
to call given an irq_desc that you want to copy/free/migrate? The
contents of the chip_data pointer will take different forms for
different irq_chips. The way the generic code is currently structured it
appears you can't (or at least don't) just do a shallow copy by copying
the irq_desc->chip_data pointer itself -- you need to do a deep copy
using a function which understands that type of chip_data.

How is this operation different to having pointers in irq_chip for
enabling/disabling/masking interrupts for each irq_chip?

Ian.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-24 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1269221770-9667-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
2010-03-22  1:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22  1:56   ` Michael Ellerman
2010-03-22  3:32     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-23  7:10       ` Paul Mundt
2010-03-24 13:33         ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-22 10:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-24 13:32     ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-24 17:44       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-24 19:16         ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2010-03-24 21:25           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1269458163.28761.859.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=lguest@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).