From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp6.netcologne.de (smtp6.netcologne.de [194.8.194.26]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B506B7D85 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:29:24 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:29:21 +0100 From: Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?b?RHJl3w==?= Subject: Re: mpc512x uart: testers wanted To: Grant Likely In-Reply-To: (from grant.likely@secretlab.ca on Sat Mar 27 03:10:36 2010) Message-Id: <1269696561.2245.2@antares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-ZCa/CBkQH9qsssN0Ag0U" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, agust@denx.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-ZCa/CBkQH9qsssN0Ag0U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Grant: Am 27.03.10 03:10 schrieb(en) Grant Likely: > Ping? I was looking at this tonight but it of course doesn't apply. Have= you gotten a chance to rebase this patch yet? Thanks for the reminder - I sent Anatolij the rebased patch off-list (as I = didn't want to clutter the list again with the same patch) 2=BD weeks ago, = but didn't get any testing results from him yet. If you want to see the pa= tch in the list, too, please just drop me a note. The patch works just fine for me on the 5200B, but IMHO it doesn't make sen= se to merge it before Anatolij could comment on the 512x part. Cheers, Albrecht. --=-ZCa/CBkQH9qsssN0Ag0U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLrggxn/9unNAn/9ERAhixAJ43NA0Q5VzHQFctvz2PD7UIWnXTmQCcDCHo NMMBcY3QY8meP9Jp3poKJUE= =Txtj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZCa/CBkQH9qsssN0Ag0U--