From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com (mail-bw0-f217.google.com [209.85.218.217]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B465B7D15 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:29:59 +1000 (EST) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3028023bwz.9 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [V3] Add non-Virtex5 support for LL TEMAC driver From: Eric Dumazet To: John Linn In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:29:53 +0200 Message-ID: <1270502993.9013.36.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Tyner , michal.simek@petalogix.com, john.williams@petalogix.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le lundi 05 avril 2010 à 15:11 -0600, John Linn a écrit : > This patch adds support for using the LL TEMAC Ethernet driver on > non-Virtex 5 platforms by adding support for accessing the Soft DMA > registers as if they were memory mapped instead of solely through the > DCR's (available on the Virtex 5). > > The patch also updates the driver so that it runs on the MicroBlaze. > The changes were tested on the PowerPC 440, PowerPC 405, and the > MicroBlaze platforms. > > Signed-off-by: John Tyner > Signed-off-by: John Linn > > --- > +/* Align the IP data in the packet on word boundaries as MicroBlaze > + * needs it. > + */ > + > #define XTE_ALIGN 32 > -#define BUFFER_ALIGN(adr) ((XTE_ALIGN - ((u32) adr)) % XTE_ALIGN) > +#define BUFFER_ALIGN(adr) ((34 - ((u32) adr)) % XTE_ALIGN) > Very interesting way of doing this, but why such convoluted thing ? Because of the % 32, this is equivalent to : #define BUFFER_ALIGN(adr) ((2 - ((u32) adr)) % XTE_ALIGN) But wait, dont we recognise the magic constant NET_IP_ALIGN ? So, I ask, cant you use netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in this driver ?