From: "Albrecht Dreß" <albrecht.dress@arcor.de>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linux PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Devicetree Discussions <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:54:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273168472.1767.1@antares> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100505220916.GD3529@ovro.caltech.edu> (from iws@ovro.caltech.edu on Thu May 6 00:09:16 2010)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 682 bytes --]
Am 06.05.10 00:09 schrieb(en) Ira W. Snyder:
> Did this series get forgotten about? I don't see it in bjdook's next-i2c branch or in benh's next branch.
It's not in Grant's 5xxx tree either - as it's specific for those processors, I think he might be the responsible person. The patch is still in a "new" state in patchwork, btw.
> I've pulled these into my 2.6.31.13 kernel, and they seem to work fine. You've got my Tested-by if you didn't get one from me already.
Tanks a lot!
I think, though, the whole stuff has been discussed in depth in February, so I do not understand why it's still pending as "new". Grant, did we miss something here?
Thanks, Albrecht.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-17 18:59 [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-17 20:10 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18 8:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 9:09 ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 12:33 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 13:23 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-05-05 22:09 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-05-06 17:54 ` Albrecht Dreß [this message]
2010-05-06 18:06 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-16 17:47 ` Albrecht Dreß
2010-05-19 16:02 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-16 19:30 ` Albrecht Dreß
2013-03-13 5:30 ` panpan2523
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-18 15:04 Albrecht Dreß
2010-02-18 17:14 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 17:41 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18 18:07 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-02-18 18:45 ` Albrecht Dreß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273168472.1767.1@antares \
--to=albrecht.dress@arcor.de \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).