linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: pacman@kosh.dhis.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: "event-scan failed" logflood
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:28:24 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273786104.21352.190.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100513111603.3352.qmail@kosh.dhis.org>

On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 06:16 -0500, pacman@kosh.dhis.org wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > 
> > Well, first it should be called once per second, not 60 times per
> > second, so something is wrong there...
> 
> Actually I think it was happening a lot more than 60 times per second, and
> klogd was losing most of the messages because they came too fast. When
> running the new kernel, vmstat shows 170000 context switches per second (and
> CPU usage never going below 5%) even when everything should be idle.
> 
> My next experiment was to hack rtas_init to return 0 unconditionally. Now
> everything still runs fine, and the context switches per second are back down
> in the 2-digit range.
> 
> > 
> > Then, it wouldn't surprise me if the Pegasos RTAS didn't implement
> > the event scan properly. Maybe we failed silently before that ? I
> > doubt it's necessary there anyways.
> 
> If I'm reading things correctly, rtas-event-scan-rate is the key to the
> frequency of attempts. And rtasd.c didn't expect this:
> 
> $ od -t x1 /proc/device-tree/rtas/rtas-event-scan-rate
> 0000000 00 00 00 00
> 0000004

Ok, that gives us a good thing to use to not do the scanning then. If
that's 0 then we assume it's a bogus OF and we disable the scan
completely. I'll do a patch later today, though feel free to beat me to
it.

Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-13 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13  4:13 "event-scan failed" logflood pacman
2010-05-13  6:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-13 10:46   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-13 11:16     ` pacman
2010-05-13 21:28       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-05-17 12:58         ` nello martuscielli
2010-05-18 12:33           ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-18 16:30             ` nello martuscielli
2010-05-19  1:39               ` Michael Ellerman
2010-06-11 13:32                 ` acrux@cruxppc.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273786104.21352.190.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pacman@kosh.dhis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).