From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp5.netcologne.de (smtp5.netcologne.de [194.8.194.25]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AC2B7DD5 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 03:48:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 19:47:59 +0200 From: Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?b?RHJl3w==?= Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery To: Grant Likely References: <20100505220916.GD3529@ovro.caltech.edu> <1273168472.1767.1@antares> In-Reply-To: (from grant.likely@secretlab.ca on Thu May 6 20:06:14 2010) Message-Id: <1274032079.1729.3@antares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="=-5nETcC2XTHhzUzma+rvq" Cc: Linux PPC Development , Devicetree Discussions , "Ben Dooks \(embedded platforms\)" , "Ira W. Snyder" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-5nETcC2XTHhzUzma+rvq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 06.05.10 20:06 schrieb(en) Grant Likely: > > I think, though, the whole stuff has been discussed in depth in Februar= y, so > > I do not understand why it's still pending as "new". =A0Grant, did we m= iss > > something here? >=20 > I generally let subsystem maintainers pick up the device driver > patches for embedded platforms I'm responsible for unless I'm asked to > do otherwise. I think ben has asked me to take these through my tree. That's , isn't it?= Hmmm, didn't find it there... :-/ Best, Albrecht. --=-5nETcC2XTHhzUzma+rvq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBL8C/Pn/9unNAn/9ERAvJWAJ0Xzcg4qyz+v7ilWBHZQIWGb3wOHQCfQc3u wc/gvVOWze93DMSyw0vuABM= =bQki -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5nETcC2XTHhzUzma+rvq--