From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0640100802 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:08:05 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Request review of device tree documentation From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Grant Likely In-Reply-To: <1276311610.1962.173.camel@pasglop> References: <1276311610.1962.173.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:07:51 +1000 Message-ID: <1276312071.1962.175.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Olof Johansson , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, devicetree-discuss , Jeremy Kerr , linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 13:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Quite nice. Maybe the introduction could use a very quick blurb on > the > various data types that dtc supports for properties, and something on > labels & phandles (references to nodes). > > I just flew over it. I'll try to give you a more in depth review > later. Oh, yes, btw, Dan is right, you do seem to mixup "model" and "compatible" all over the place :-) Maybe a paragraph on the new proposed clock binding that Jeremy is working would be of use btw. Cheers, Ben.