linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Faster MMU lookups for Book3s v3
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:50:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278039029.4200.372.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2C8FA8.1030702@suse.de>

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:52 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Page ageing is difficult. The HTAB has a hardware set referenced bit,
> but we don't have a guarantee that the entry is still there when we look
> for it. Something else could have overwritten it by then, but the entry
> could still be lingering around in the TLB.
> 
> So I think the only reasonable way to implement page ageing is to unmap
> pages. And that's slow, because it means we have to map them again on
> access. Bleks. Or we could look for the HTAB entry and only unmap them
> if the entry is moot.

Well, not quite.

We -could- use the HW reference bit. However, that means that whenever
we flush the hash PTE we get a snapshot of the HW bit and copy it over
to the PTE.

That's not -that- bad for normal invalidations. However, it's a problem
potentially for eviction. IE. When a hash bucket is full, we
pseudo-randomly evict a slot. If we were to use the HW ref bit, we would
need a way to go back to the PTE from the hash bucket to perform that
update (or something really tricky like sticking it in a list somewhere,
and have the young test walk that list when non-empty, etc...)

Cheers,
Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-02  2:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30 13:18 [PATCH 0/2] Faster MMU lookups for Book3s v3 Alexander Graf
2010-06-30 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Alexander Graf
2010-06-30 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Make use of hash based Shadow MMU Alexander Graf
2010-07-01  7:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] Faster MMU lookups for Book3s v3 Avi Kivity
2010-07-01  8:18   ` Alexander Graf
2010-07-01  8:40     ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 10:00       ` Alexander Graf
2010-07-01 11:14         ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:28           ` Alexander Graf
2010-07-01 12:43             ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:52               ` Alexander Graf
2010-07-01 13:42                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-02  2:54                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-02  2:50                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-07-01 15:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1278039029.4200.372.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).