linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>
To: jjDaNiMoTh <jjdanimoth@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4 ppc crash when loading radeon modeset=1
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:19:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279030767.515.15.camel@thor.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikdlwl6VxdbkHP0TveQ3SPO0w4RD-onoG3QPyCO@mail.gmail.com>

On Die, 2010-07-13 at 16:03 +0200, jjDaNiMoTh wrote:=20
>=20
> When trying new 2.6.35-rc4, our kernel team (ArchLinuxPPC) has tried
> to setup KMS acceleration for radeon based machine.
> We have removed radeonfb, and all others framebuffer driver, and added
> fbcon and KMS enabled by default for radeon driver.
>=20
> With a clean start, the screen freeze, when the control pass from
> yaboot to kernel.
>=20
> If we start with video=3Dfbcon (or video=3Dradeondrmfb), we could reach
> the loading modules point, [...]

Which framebuffer device (if any) is it trying to initialize otherwise?
OFfb? The first paragraph above implies none, but then I'm not sure why
the video=3D parameters would make any difference.


> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] initializing kernel modesetting
> (RV350 0x1002:0x4E50).
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] register mmio base: 0xB0000000
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] register mmio size: 65536
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] Using generic clock info
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: agpgart-uninorth 0000:00:0b.0: putting AGP
> V2 device into 4x mode
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: radeon 0000:00:10.0: putting AGP V2 device
> into 4x mode
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: radeon 0000:00:10.0: GTT: 256M 0x00000000
> - 0x0FFFFFFF
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] Generation 2 PCI interface, using
> max accessible memory
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: radeon 0000:00:10.0: VRAM: 64M 0xB8000000
> - 0xBBFFFFFF (64M used)
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=3D64M, BAR=3D128M
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics
> memory: 384990 kiB.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [TTM] Zone highmem: Available graphics
> memory: 516062 kiB.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [TTM] Initializing pool allocator.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: 64M of VRAM memory ready
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: 256M of GTT memory ready.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 Z pipes initial=
ized.
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: ring at 0x0000000000000000
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] ring test succeeded in 3 usecs
> Jul 13 15:31:39 jim kernel: [drm] radeon: ib pool ready.

So far, so good.

> Jul 13 15:31:40 jim kernel: GPU lockup (waiting for 0x00000001 last
> fence id 0x00000000)

The GPU locks up, and things go downhill from there...

Does KMS work better with radeon.agpmode=3D1 (or 2 or -1)?


--=20
Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer           |                http://www.vmware.c=
om
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-13 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13 14:03 2.6.35-rc4 ppc crash when loading radeon modeset=1 jjDaNiMoTh
2010-07-13 14:19 ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2010-07-13 14:51   ` jjDaNiMoTh
2010-07-13 14:59     ` Michel Dänzer
2010-07-13 16:02       ` jjDaNiMoTh
2010-07-13 16:09         ` Michel Dänzer
2010-07-13 17:05           ` jjDaNiMoTh
2010-07-13 17:22             ` Michel Dänzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1279030767.515.15.camel@thor.local \
    --to=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=jjdanimoth@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).