From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7A41007D1 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:33:08 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc From: Matthew McClintock To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: References: <1279120733-13584-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> <1279122163.13098.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:17:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1279174642.28344.6.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:46 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > What about just one node called "flat-device-tree"? > > But *what* flat device tree? It cannot be "the" flat device tree, > or it would be useless information, since we are already reading it! I thought about it all day and did not come up with anything terribly insightful... "boot-fdt-phys-addr" "fdt-phys-addr" "boot-fdt-phys-reg" "fdt-phys-addr-reg" Thoughts? -M