From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: OOPS at bot time
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:19:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279847985.4883.391.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100723102202.871a3131.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:22 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My Power7 boot test paniced like this: (next-20100722)
>
> %GQLogic Fibre Channel HBA Driver: 8.03.03-k0
> qla2xxx 0002:01:00.2: enabling device (0144 -> 0146)
> qla2xxx 0002:01:00.2: Found an ISP8001, irq 35, iobase 0xd000080080014000
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at drivers/pci/msi.c:205!
[...]
> Call Trace:
> [c00000000278b270] [c000000000048d9c] .rtas_setup_msi_irqs+0x1d8/0x254 (unreliable)
> [c00000000278b360] [c00000000002a9cc] .arch_setup_msi_irqs+0x34/0x4c
> [c00000000278b3e0] [c0000000002fd3fc] .pci_enable_msix+0x49c/0x4ac
[...]
> That line number is this:
>
> BUG_ON(!(entry->msg.address_hi | entry->msg.address_lo |
> entry->msg.data));
>
> in read_msi_msg_desc(). That BUG_ON was added by commit
> 2ca1af9aa3285c6a5f103ed31ad09f7399fc65d7 ("PCI: MSI: Remove unsafe and
> unnecessary hardware access") from the pci tree.
I wanted to assert that read_msi_msg_desc() is only used to update
MSI/MSI-X descriptors that have already been generated by Linux. It
looks like you found an exception.
We could make read_msi_msg() fall back to reading from the hardware, but
I think that what the pSeries code is trying to do - save an MSI message
generated by firmware - is different from what the other callers want.
Instead we could add:
void save_msi_msg(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
struct msi_desc *entry = get_irq_desc_msi(desc);
struct msi_msg *msg = &entry->msg;
/* ...followed by the old implementation of read_msi_msg_desc() */
}
Possibly conditional on something like CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_SAVE_MSI_MSG.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-23 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-23 0:22 linux-next: OOPS at bot time Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-23 1:19 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-07-23 2:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-07-23 13:56 ` [PATCH] PCI: MSI: Restore read_msi_msg_desc(); add get_cached_msi_msg_desc() Ben Hutchings
2010-07-26 11:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-07-30 16:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-08-01 6:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2012-11-20 7:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-11-20 12:36 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279847985.4883.391.camel@localhost \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).